Five marketing time wasters

Deciding how to allocate time and resources is a difficult process for any business -and it’s even harder for start-ups. But of all the allocation decisions to be made, there’s none more difficult than marketing.time-waster

Promote your company too little and you’re almost certainly doomed to fail. Promote it too much and you’re squandering dollars that might be better spent on R&D or preparing for a fundraising round.

As you consider your marketing strategies, here are five things you can (and should) avoid. Some may sound appealing on paper, but they don’t contribute much, if anything, in the early stages of your company’s life.

Bloated Marketing Requirements Documents (MRD) – How often have you been a part of a team that produced a 30 page MRD with detailed specifications for your product before you have even tested your product concepts, validated the customer need and verified your pricing assumptions? It happens more often than you think.

The primary goal of a startup is to identify and meet a market need with a product or service that can be profitable. Spending inordinate amounts of time on detailed MRDs without frequent customer interaction not only wastes the time of the product manager and colleagues who review the document, but  it can point you down the wrong product development path, which can be a fatal misstep.

Direct mail lead generation – Direct marketing is well on its way to extinction for startups, but there are still a number of direct mail service providers trying to keep this medium of lead generation alive.

Email campaigns typically have a sub-1 percent response rate. “Snail mail” direct marketing is inordinately expensive. In either case, these programs rarely justify the time, financial expenditure and effort required. And even when you do get a response, you end up spending additional sales dollars as you’re forced to wade through the inevitable unqualified leads that come from the large databases required to make these programs work.

Analyst subscriptions – A subscription to a premium analyst service like Gartner Group can run upwards of $30-$40k per year. Very rarely do these services pay off for a startup.

Many companies sign up simply hoping the subscription will result in more favorable reviews by the analyst. While this can sometimes be the case, it’s pretty infrequent. You’re better served developing a relationship with key analysts.

This doesn’t mean you should avoid analyst paid services all together. Engaging an analyst for consulting on product direction and business development input is often very helpful in refining your product and business strategy.  Independent ROI case studies like Forrester’s Total Economic Impact can effectively communicate the value your product brings to your customers.

Branding, advertising, and trade show sponsorships – Beware of spending any time or money on services whose stated objective is creating “buzz” or “brand awareness.”

In the vast majority of cases, brand awareness is a byproduct of a successful business that listens to its customers and creates great products. Sponsorships aren’t cheap and they’ll drain your early stage capital with very little tangible return.

Detailed sales PowerPoint presentations – PowerPoint presentations can be tremendous tools when presenting at a conference or in front of a large audience, but for startup sales meetings they are often counterproductive.

Too much time is spent crafting, refining and training your team on the perfect presentation.  The inherent problem with PowerPoint for early sales situations is that it favors one-way communication.

Startup sales meetings should be as much about listening as presenting. Slides should only be used to communicate concepts that don’t lend themselves to a conversation – like graphics, charts or illustrations to enhance understanding.

Instead of long presentations, startup sales meetings should be collaborative and conversational with the following objectives:

  • Validate your customer problem
  • Explain and demonstrate your product
  • Establish your credentials
  • Validate your pricing
  • Listen, listen, listen

If you’re in the early stages, you should be saying ‘no’ to far more marketing projects than you say ‘yes’. Focus your efforts on helping ideal customers find your company, enhancing and refining your product to create value and address real problems, and communicating effectively through a variety of mediums.

Marketing departments should be held accountable for the ROI they bring to the company – and should be stingy about how they spend their time and budget.

Next Story: Heatwave Interactive unveiling hip-hop online role-playing game with T.I.
Previous Story: uShow lets videos skip to the good stuff

Tags:

Photo of Scott Olson

About the Author, Scott Olson

Scott Olson is a serial entrepreneur and is currently the president of MindLink Marketing providing strategic marketing services to startups. He has founded two companies, one of which was sold to Cisco Systems, and served as the VP of Marketing at three others, one of which was sold to Symantec. He has guest lectured at the University of Texas at Austin on Entrepreneurship. In 2007, Duke University Engineering Department honored Scott with the Distinguished Young Alumni award. He can be found on twitter at @scottdolson1.

  • I agree that a PowerPoint presentation about your products will not best serve the new entrepreneur. Nobody cares about you, your product or your services until you show that you care about them (the client) and their issues. How do you show that you care? Talk about them! Their problems! Their needs! Talk about what keeps them up at night.

    Now an interactive PPT can be very powerful. I worked with an entrepreneur who is a corporate concierge. Her offering was grouped into three main categories based on the client's point of view - personal, business and community. She started her story by discussing the busy and hectic schedules of business executives these days and how things can seem to get out of control. She then started to briefly describe the pain associated with family, business and community matters and commitments. during this process she watched the body language of the client. If they showed interest in the personal side, she clicked on an icon that brought up the personal issues many executives struggle with such as missed birthday's, anniversaries, house maintenance etc. When they acknowledged one area of pain or need, she then offered her solutions for further discussion. Where ever the client wanted to go with the conversation, the interactive PowerPoint could accommodate.

    She rarely finishes her presentation without getting an order or referral first.

    Mr Olson I applaud your incite and great help you this information offers to entrepreneurs. Often they get caught into the spiral of desperate marketing strategies and tactics. The result is lost revenues and often a failed business.
  • EFFECTIVE POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS

    Mr. Plebon,

    Thank you for this excellent example of good presentation style and tactic. Thanks also to Mr. Olson for pointing out what not to do (and to do, which appeared in a different post) in marketing. As an entrepreneur I have had to struggle with marketing - marketing is often overlooked and for small companies and startups marketing (i.e., building awareness) is a prerequisite to sales. I learned that the steps to marketing are encapsulated in the acronym AIDA (A= awareness, I = interest, D = desire, A = action). Because the process of selling something has to go through these steps, marketing is absolutely vital to the first 3 stages. Mr. Plebon, your insights into interactive presentations is awesome. Looking forward to learning more from you.
  • Scott -- I'm not sure that direct mail marketing is dead. We've used it quite a but with varying degrees of success. As a company, we produce DVDs and have seen success with direct mail.
  • Hi Aanarav, thanks for your comment. If direct marketing is not dead it's dying and becoming increasingly difficult to get a good ROI from the programs in my experience. Postcard mailers in particular get such a low response rate that it is difficult to make the numbers work. Entry costs for these programs are high. You have the cost of the design of the mailers, the purchase of the marketing database, the lead capture for your web, the printing and postage, and usually you need to have multiple follow up mails. A sub-1 percent response rate requires a very large target list to get any kind of response. Larger lists of course also means larger costs.

    With these programs many of the leads are unqualified even for those that do respond. This problem is especially true for startups because you are still in the process of identifying your ideal customers and validating your product approach. Because of this conversion rates for people that have responded are not good either. So if you are sending out 1,000 mailers, and you get 5 responses and maybe 1-2, but often 0, convert to sales. At these types of conversion rates it is difficult to make the numbers work. 3-dimensional mailers can get better response rates, but the cost is typically higher as well.

    The problem with these programs for startups is not that they can't work, but that they so rarely provide a good ROI. Usually a starting point for these programs is $30-50k (much higher for 3D mailers) and is too much capital to commit to a risky program when capital is so valuable. In my opinion today's lead generation efforts should be more focused on helping good prospects find your company rather than marketing to the world.
  • Scott -- If the starting point of these programs is in the range that you mention ($30k to $50k), then I agree that it's hard to get a return. However, in our case, the cost has been fairly minimal as we've been collecting leads for years. If someone has to start from scratch -- with no leads, then it's a hefty challenge.
  • Thanks again for the comments. Knowing your audience and having a solid prospect list of qualified targets with established and proven messaging is the key to making direct marketing work. Unfortunately for start-ups, they usually don't have these things. Start-ups are very much in a discovery process of what works with the ideal customer profile, appropriate messaging, and the ideal product. I didn't mean to imply that direct marketing will never work, but for start-ups, more often than not it doesn't.
  • xeniar
    200% agree with you! We do PR for startups and they either have a marketing overkill going on or cannot answer quesitons like, who is going to use your product and why... seems to be always one of the two extremes.... Cheers, X
  • Interesting thread of discussion. I believe that marketing for small and medium comapnies is about having a balanced approach, and sticking with it over a period of time.
  • Xeniar, Barry and M.J., thanks for your comments. Lots of good thoughts and additional things to think about.
  • Hi Scott,

    I almost agree 100% with your list of marketing "not to do" for startups.

    I would moderate your post on 2 points :
    - branding : I'm differentiating branding from advertising and sponsorships. Branding is important for startups as soon as you enter the phase when you have a product and a value proposition (and market positioning). You then need to start working on your branding in order to accelerate your penetration of your market (mainly if you are in B2B and selling to large accounts), ie being recognized as a credible alternative : building your brand (PR, analysts, influencers) will support the trust and credentials that you must work on.
    - detailed powerpoint presentation. It depends on what you call "detailed"... But in order to be recognized as a trustful provider, you need to be as professional as the big guys who are your competitors. And a "professional" ppt is a must-have.

    Regards