4 ways to get automatically rejected by an angel investor

I’ve started three companies, and now I’m an angel investor. So I’ve been on both sides of the table.
There are lots of good articles out there about pitching, and surely everyone who pitches me has read some of them. Still though, a few problems appear over and over again. If you’ve ever had to sort through resumes and cover letters, you’ve seen this effect: People tend to have the same misconceptions and therefore make the same mistakes.
What follows are four problems I see all the time, each of which makes me roll my eyes and sometimes even terminate the conversation early.
Be dismissive of the competition.
Let me guess what your feature-comparison chart looks like:
<INSERT CHART HERE>
You have all the checkmarks, they have few. Even when your competitor has a checkmark too, your implementation is still better. There’s nothing they have that you don’t. Oh, and they’re more expensive too.
When I see this chart, all I know is: It’s a lie.
The point of “competitive analysis” isn’t to say: “I’m better than everyone else.” Rather, it’s to define your niche in the market and explain how you own that niche better than everyone else.
Need to be further humbled? Here are some things not in your little feature-comparison chart:
Those competitors probably have more customers than you.
Those competitors probably have more revenue than you.
Your potential customers have possibly heard of one of these competitors but almost certainly never heard of you.
Those competitors are already ahead of you in discovering, defining and attacking the market.
People rarely buy on the basis of “most features.”
So what should you do instead?
Define the segment of the market that’s being underserved. Part of this is admitting what part of the market is being well served, and who is serving it.
Admitting where your competitors are strong earns you the credibility to point out where they are weak.
Explain how there’s a portion of the market being missed rather than having to displace a product. Once you have your own niche you can talk about creeping into another niche.
Explain how having fewer features or different features makes for a product that’s more exciting or versatile or more relatable or usable or viral.
Give testimonials of people being “fed up with” the competitor and how they’ll run into your arms.
Explain how it’s not possible for competitors to compete on your terms. Maybe the competitor’s business model uses channel sales, so by using a direct model you can compete on price. Or perhaps the competitor has $30m paid-in-capital so they must roll the dice on big market plays while you can be smaller and safer. It’s also possible the competitor maintains a “big company” image to land enterprise sales, so they cannot copy your folksy small-business cool persona. Give concrete examples.
Have five-year projections.
I don’t care what you’re projecting — seats, customers, revenue, profits, market growth — it’s all crap.
That’s right, it’s crap. You made it up, and you know it, and now you’re insulting me by expecting me to believe it.
Oh wait, you say it’s a “conservative estimate?” No, the conservative estimate is that you burn through all your cash in nine months and start taking on consulting gigs to delay a return to a “real job” in corporate America. (Not that I blame you.)
But, really, this is good news! You don’t have to invent crazy models that no one believes. You can focus on useful stuff instead.
Like what?
Show how fast you can get to cash-flow-positive. After that you’re not burning money, and that’s the hardest part of your journey, so address that first. If the rest takes longer, that’s ok.
Explain how revenue will outstrip expenses as you get customers. That’s something you have more control over, and that makes it clear that as you grow, you have a sustainable, profitable company.
If you must give projections, at least make a range, and make the distance between max and min widen the further out you go. And maybe stop at two years? If you can’t be profitable within 24 months, either it’s a bad business idea or you need to raise big VC instead of angel money.
Actually say, “I would show you five-year projections, but we both know those are crap. Let’s talk about how I’m going to make this business profitable.” Just that one sentence alone sets the tone of the conversation.
Gloss over your strategy for customer acquisition.
Here’s the typical slide I see for customer acquisition strategy:
Google AdSense
Ads on selected relevant web sites
Blogger outreach
Social Media presence (blog, Twitter, Facebook)
Co-branding
Partnerships
Yes, these are ways to get customers, but here’s the problem: Every company on Earth tries these things – and most fail anyway. Therefore, this list is uninspiring – and it isn’t enough.
Anything that everyone else does is boring and unconvincing. There’s no competitive advantage. There’s nothing there that makes me more likely to think you will pull this off.
Of course it’s true that to some extent marketing has to be “trial and error,” or better yet “experiment and measure.” And it’s ok to say that, and it ok to list some traditional modes, but this isn’t sufficient.
After all, if all your strategy is “We’ll try stuff until something works,” I have no reason to believe something will ever work!
So here’s what you should do:
Internalize that your route to getting customers is critical to your success. Admit that to me and yourself — this is one of those things that makes or breaks the entire venture! Spend real time in your pitch on this subject.
Be specific. Specifics are compelling and paint a picture in my head that I can get behind. Examples:
Not just “Blogger outreach,” but “We’ve done a few guest-posts on mommy-blogs and given the comments and traffic that seems to be a good outlet for us, so now we’ll expand in that area with more posts, ads, etc.”
Not just “Facebook presence,” but “We’re using a Facebook application platform that’s been proven to work in such-and-such parallel business and we think we can duplicate the mechanism.”
Not just “Community outreach,” but “The founders have lined up speaking engagements at these five local groups and we’re hoping that after collecting feedback and testimonials from that we can branch out into neighboring cities.”
Something creative. If I haven’t heard about this marketing technique before, that’s probably a good thing. At least you’re not just doing what everyone else is, which in this day and age is already an advantage.
A viral product. If “viralness” isn’t baked into the product itself, you’re already behind. Especially if it’s a web-app. If you can show how the app helps spread itself (i.e. invites, sharing, integrating with social media crap, only works with a friend, affiliate program), that helps me see how X customers leads to X+1 customers.
Do what you think you “should” do instead of what feels right.
There’s a ton of advice on raising money. Don’t take any of that advice just because you read it somewhere.
Yes, including this article! Yes, including this tip too. (Wait a minute…)
Seriously, be yourself. Filter all advice through your own lens. Think of this like you’re getting married — if you’re not yourself, not honest, how will you hook up with an investor that gets you, likes you, and believes in your core motivations and values?
Now go out there, tell the truth, be real, and raise some money!

(Editor’s note: Jason Cohen is founder of Smart Bear Software. He contributed this column to VentureBeat.)

I’ve started three companies, and now I’m an angel investor. So I’ve been on both sides of the table.cohen-feature-comparison-chart

There are lots of good articles out there about pitching, and surely everyone who pitches me has read some of them. Still, a few problems appear over and over again. If you’ve ever had to sort through resumes and cover letters, you’ve seen this effect: People tend to have the same misconceptions and therefore make the same mistakes.

What follows are four problems I see all the time, each of which makes me roll my eyes and sometimes even terminate the conversation early.

Be dismissive of the competition.

Let me guess what your feature-comparison chart looks like. Probably pretty close to the illustration to the right, huh?

You have all the checkmarks, they have few. Even when your competitor has a checkmark too, your implementation is still better. There’s nothing they have that you don’t. Oh, and they’re more expensive too.

When I see this chart, all I know is: It’s a lie.

The point of “competitive analysis” isn’t to say: “I’m better than everyone else.” Rather, it’s to define your niche in the market and explain how you own that niche better than everyone else.

Need to be further humbled? Here are some things not in your little feature-comparison chart:

  • Those competitors probably have more customers than you.
  • Those competitors probably have more revenue than you.
  • Your potential customers have possibly heard of one of these competitors but almost certainly never heard of you.
  • Those competitors are already ahead of you in discovering, defining and attacking the market.
  • People rarely buy on the basis of “most features.”

So what should you do instead?

  • Define the segment of the market that’s being underserved. Part of this is admitting what part of the market is being well served, and who is serving it.
  • Admitting where your competitors are strong earns you the credibility to point out where they are weak.
  • Explain how there’s a portion of the market being missed rather than having to displace a product. Once you have your own niche you can talk about creeping into another niche.
  • Explain how having fewer features or different features makes for a product that’s more exciting or versatile or more relatable or usable or viral.
  • Give testimonials of people being “fed up with” the competitor and how they’ll run into your arms.
  • Explain how it’s not possible for competitors to compete on your terms. Maybe the competitor’s business model uses channel sales, so by using a direct model you can compete on price. Or perhaps the competitor has $30m paid-in-capital so they must roll the dice on big market plays while you can be smaller and safer. It’s also possible the competitor maintains a “big company” image to land enterprise sales, so they cannot copy your folksy small-business cool persona. Give concrete examples.

Have five-year projections.

I don’t care what you’re projecting – seats, customers, revenue, profits, market growth – it’s all crap.

That’s right, it’s crap. You made it up, and you know it, and now you’re insulting me by expecting me to believe it.

Oh wait, you say it’s a “conservative estimate?” No, the conservative estimate is that you burn through all your cash in nine months and start taking on consulting gigs to delay a return to a “real job” in corporate America. (Not that I blame you.)

But, really, this is good news! You don’t have to invent crazy models that no one believes. You can focus on useful stuff instead.

Like what?

  • Show how fast you can get to cash-flow-positive. After that you’re not burning money, and that’s the hardest part of your journey, so address that first. If the rest takes longer, that’s ok.
  • Explain how revenue will outstrip expenses as you get customers. That’s something you have more control over, and that makes it clear that as you grow, you have a sustainable, profitable company.
  • If you must give projections, at least make a range, and make the distance between max and min widen the further out you go. And maybe stop at two years? If you can’t be profitable within 24 months, either it’s a bad business idea or you need to raise big VC instead of angel money.
  • Actually say, “I would show you five-year projections, but we both know those are crap. Let’s talk about how I’m going to make this business profitable.” Just that one sentence alone sets the tone of the conversation.

Gloss over your strategy for customer acquisition.

Here’s the typical slide I see for customer acquisition strategy:

  • Google AdSense
  • Ads on selected relevant web sites
  • Blogger outreach
  • Social Media presence (blog, Twitter, Facebook)
  • Co-branding
  • Partnerships

Yes, these are ways to get customers, but here’s the problem: Every company on Earth tries these things – and most fail anyway. Therefore, this list is uninspiring – and it isn’t enough.

Anything that everyone else does is boring and unconvincing. There’s no competitive advantage. There’s nothing there that makes me more likely to think you will pull this off.

Of course it’s true that, to some extent, marketing has to be “trial and error,” or better yet “experiment and measure.” And it’s ok to say that, and it ok to list some traditional modes, but this isn’t sufficient.

After all, if all your strategy is “We’ll try stuff until something works,” I have no reason to believe something will ever work!

So here’s what you should do:

  • Internalize that your route to getting customers is critical to your success. Admit that to me and yourself — this is one of those things that makes or breaks the entire venture! Spend real time in your pitch on this subject.
  • Be specific. Specifics are compelling and paint a picture in my head that I can get behind. Examples:
    • Not just “Blogger outreach,” but “We’ve done a few guest-posts on mommy-blogs and given the comments and traffic that seems to be a good outlet for us, so now we’ll expand in that area with more posts, ads, etc.”
    • Not just “Facebook presence,” but “We’re using a Facebook application platform that’s been proven to work in such-and-such parallel business and we think we can duplicate the mechanism.”
    • Not just “Community outreach,” but “The founders have lined up speaking engagements at these five local groups and we’re hoping that after collecting feedback and testimonials from that we can branch out into neighboring cities.”
  • Something creative. If I haven’t heard about this marketing technique before, that’s probably a good thing. At least you’re not just doing what everyone else is, which in this day and age is already an advantage.
  • A viral product. If “viralness” isn’t baked into the product itself, you’re already behind. Especially if it’s a web-app. If you can show how the app helps spread itself (i.e. invites, sharing, integrating with social media crap, only works with a friend, affiliate program), that helps me see how X customers leads to X+1 customers.

Do what you think you “should” do instead of what feels right.

There’s a ton of advice on raising money. Don’t take any of that advice just because you read it somewhere.

Yes, including this article! Yes, including this tip too. (Wait a minute…)

Seriously, be yourself. Filter all advice through your own lens. Think of this like you’re getting married — if you’re not yourself, not honest, how will you hook up with an investor that gets you, likes you, and believes in your core motivations and values?

Now go out there, tell the truth, be real, and raise some money!

Next Story: With 100,000 apps, is Apple’s iPhone unstoppable?
Previous Story: Funambol acquires Zapatec for an age of “sync and push” mobile apps

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Photo of Jason Cohen

About the Author, Jason Cohen

Jason Cohen is the founder of Smart Bear Software, maker of Code Collaborator. He was also a founding member of ITWatchdogs, another bootstrapped startup which became profitable and was sold, and is a mentor at Capital Factory. He is the author of Best Kept Secrets of Peer Code Review, which examines modern, lightweight methods for doing peer code review effectively without everyone hating life. He also blogs regularly at A Smart Bear.

  • and here's advice for the startup: be wary of the angel investor who hasn't tried/used your webapp.

    It may look/sound good on paper, but if they haven't created an account and are drinking the Kool Aid, I'd pass. Sure, extra money is nice (as we've been offered), if we do decide to take on investors, it would be nice that they use your product first (and "get it").
  • Love it, thanks!
  • tikilgs
    Never seen a Forum which works so bad : register and then to login with 4 password changes asked and received and finally being told that my mail is not valid ! ? ? They have a problem with keyboards from abroad ? First of 15 years !

    What Zeppelin says is fundamental and applies to all contributors and providers and counsels for your project. They may be right, as all your non-buyers will be, but you have to make the acid test and know where they stand !
  • mojoworkin
    Very good. The subtext is, "risk is much less speculative than upside and looms much larger to someone risking their own capital. You are showing disrespect if you try to sweep the risks as you see them under the rug or if you hype the upside to try and tilt the balance in your favor."

    Your best bet is to help an investor evaluate the nature of the risk in their own terms, and let the chips fall where they may. If they pull the trigger, you can be comfortable that you have discharged your responsibility up to that point and that the risk of reaching into their pocket is all theirs.

    This is the only thing you can do to try to preserve investor relations through the inevitable twists and turns going forward. It may still not work, but that's life.
  • Yes, terrific observation! I agree completely and I wish I had thought of it first. :-)
  • Great article. In the same vein, here are two phrases that raise red flags for me:

    "I believe that..." - every entrepreneur *believes* that their business will succeed and become profitable, so belief is not of much use in an presentation to investors. I want to hear the entrepreneur justify, explain, reason and provide evidence for why they're going to succeed, not simply assert it.

    "educate the market" - nobody wants the product, but the entrepreneur thinks that with enough clever marketing and persuasion they can make people want it. (Occasionally this phrase is valid, if we're talking about a new solution to an old problem, but I hear it all too often when this isn't the case.)

    What amazes me is how often I hear these two exact phrases from so many entrepreneurs.
  • I totally agree with both points! Thanks.
  • Great post Jason. I've been an angel for a couple of decades (even when I was running a venture capital firm.) Your points are all valid, but today, I would add two much more effective ways to get rejected by angels: by not having a realistic exit strategy and by saying that you plan to follow the angel round with a traditional Venture Capital round. The second is an especially quick way to turn off the majority of angels that I know. This video of a recent keynote will explain in detail: http://www.angelblog.net/Exit_Early_Exit_Often_...
  • That's hilarious, because what you don't know is that there's a part 2 of this article already queued up, and one of those points is there!

    :-)

    Thanks for posting the video too. The more perspective folks get on this, the better.
  • kerryrosenhagen
    I don't want to invest in anyone with an 'exit strategy'. The only strategy I want to invest in, ever, is a growth strategy. Principals with an exit strategy are by definition 'short timers'. Never invest in a short timer. If the deal falls through, you are left with damaged goods. Businesses should never be managed to maximize short-term objectives. Focus on maximizing the long-term value and the 'exit opportunity' will present itself.

    Actually, "Presenting an exit strategy" should replace "have 5 year projections" in the list. Every business should have five year projections. You know, and they know, that they are only a guess. I'd much rather invest in a business that has a plan for growth than a business that has a plan to exit.
  • Kerry - that's what makes angel investing interesting. Angels are much more diverse than traditional Venture Capital investors. When I invest, I want to get my money back. And I'd like to get it back in 3 to 5 years instead of 10 to 12 years. So I like to focus on companies that can produce an exit in 3 to 5 years.

    I have to disagree with your comments about 'damaged goods' or 'short timers'. This is a common misconception. There is NOTHING different about managing a company to maximize shareholder value and investment return. In fact, I believe the primary job of every management team is to maximize shareholder value (assuming the company has investors).

    I also strongly disagree with your point about an exit opportunity 'presenting itself'. This is another common mistake. The exit is just another business process. An optimum exit requires strategy, planning and execution.
  • kerryrosenhagen
    Labeling someone's argument a 'common misconception' is 'common' way to discredit the argument in a condescending way. I have been involved in company's who's management was myopically focused on its exit strategy such that it ran an excellent business nearly into the ground. If they would have focused on running the business there is no question in my mind that the would have achieved their 'exit' goals, but instead they now are trying to rebuild the business. It is my opinion and experience that successful companies with excellent financial results are always marketable, and the best way to achieve excellent financial results is to focus on your business strategy, not your exit strategy. If you focus on the exit strategy and fail to achieve it, you likely will have destroyed much of the value you had once created.

    In the end, this discussion is largely philosophical, and I have a feeling we will have to agree to disagree.
  • Good discussion though guys, thanks for the perspectives!

    If I may weigh in, first it's clear that "Angel" can mean several things, which might be the cause of the disconnect. For example, there's "Angel" as is "before the planned A and B rounds" and "Angel" as in "We shouldn't need any more money than this."

    I am writing from the latter perspective; it's possible (correct me!) that e.g. Kerry is writing from the former? In any case, clearly there are different possible motives.

    I would agree that if the business is healthy, exit opportunities do appear in the sense that a growing, profitable company of a certain size or higher is always in demand, even as a profitable division of a holding company designed for such things. I also agree that myopically setting you sites on "exit" could damage your perspective on just building a good company.

    Still, for an investor it's nice to have possible exits understood. E.g. that it's typical for this industry to consolidate.

    But there are other ways -- like balloon loans -- for an Angel to make a good return without worrying about exit at all!
  • kerryrosenhagen
    After re-reading the about exchange, I think part of the disagreement may be due to varying definitions of 'exit strategy'. If we are talking about providing the angel investor with a realistic sense of being able to make a great return and exit the investment within his/her timeline, then I agree that it is something the company can and should help the angel think through. If we are talking about a corporate strategy to build the business to be acquired (or even go public) on a timeline, then an 'exit strategy' is most often very distracting and potential damaging to the company. Management will start to run the company to maximize short term performance in an effort to make it as attractive as possible, since valuation is usually based on trailing 12 months. Management's focus needs to be on creating value over the long-term, otherwise its future will definitely be short-term.

    Independent of the above, I feel strongly that EVERY COMPANY, especially those seeking capital, should have a 5 year plan. Its the only way any investor can be sure they have thought through how their business strategy might produce financial success. Agreed it is a guess at best, and the potential investor is free to ignore it if they like. However, every one of my clients is a better company now because of what they learned through the process of developing the 5 year plan.
  • Jason,

    Great post. I really enjoyed reading each section and your breakdown of the 4 ways to get rejected. Of course, I love your final one! As we are currently in the process of trying to raise funding, I will be sure to keep this post on the fridge.

    Best,

    John
    www.adstruc.com
    Building an online marketplace for outdoor advertising.
  • Chris
    This is also a great list for companies that are funded already or bootstrapping. One can underestimate competitors or take the wrong direction when looking for customers no matter who's footing the bill.
  • I'd have to politely disagree. While you don't want to underestimate competitors per se, I think competition is a healthy thing. I actually just released an article today entitled Finding the Needles in the Haystack: Why competition is healthy. that talks about this very thing. Check out my first paragraph.
  • I think you're both right! :-)

    Competition is healthy because it indicates there's a market. However if you don't have a good story for how you'll carve your niche in that market, then it's not clear that you'll defeat that competition.

    Good stuff guys!
  • DMcNulty
    Jason,

    Loved your article. Many of our luxury clients are looking for investment, Angel, VC, and PE, great points.

    If you would like to connect, please find our information on;

    www.linkedin.com look under Diane M. McNulty.

    Cheers,
    Diane
    Founder and CEO
    360 Degrees Luxury Development, Ltd.
    Diane.McNulty@360DegreesLuxuryDevelopmentltd.com
  • 360degreesluxurydevelopmentltd? Ha! Do you also offer timeshare holiday homes coupled with a guaranteed baldness cure? Cause I'm sold! Invite me to the next conference!
  • Jason - Great stuff. Having been on the side of bootstrapping and raising money, this definitely resonates. The part about the five-year projections is particularly helpful. Thanks.
  • ron
    In short, probably the message is "don't come for angel investment, until you have some proof that your business is viable...run some prototypes and let me know the results...."
  • Great article. Thanks. I second the projections as being 100% crap, yet VCs always want financials etc. which I dutifully make up crap suppositions about, and I can't stand it!
  • jennifer
    I was just in a session talking about what investors like to see and they all agreed they *do* like 5 year projections.

    The reason?

    They know the numbers are crap but the projections are invaluable in showing your thinking, your assumptions, whether you really understand your market, and what you think is going to happen to it. I guess this would be valid for angels too, but if the person or firm funding you expects you to hit the sort of imaginary numbers you're pulling out of Excel, think twice about whether you want them to fund you in the first place.
  • Hi Jennifer,

    I agree that VCs want to see it, but I disagree that it's useful. I understand about the thought process, but you can talk about that without actually inventing numbers.

    Angels are usually very different than VCs in the type of companies they want to invest in. This really depends on whether you expect to ONLY raise Angel or whether Angel is the round before round A. If the latter, you're right. If the former, the type of investor is different.
  • Agreed that many want projections anyway. However you might find that VCs want projections, but Angels are not as interested.

    Perhaps a better way to put it would be: Have a reasonable path to profitability, but not hard numbers to hit in 3 years.

    Finally, if your Angel or VC is adamant about those projections, consider that perhaps you don't want their money, because they're already not thinking properly about business.
  • Dan D
    This is a great post as it really sums up points that can be taken out of context of Angel investment and still be extremely useful to a start up. Thanks!
  • Jason,
    I am scheduled to teach an online entrepreneurship course in early 2010--I'd like to use this material as "required reading" for my students. Please contact me (Ask_Karen on Twitter). Thanks.
  • "I would show you five-year projections, but we both know those are crap. Let’s talk about how I’m going to make this business profitable."

    I'm going to put this statement to the test. I have absolutely no way to know how my first business will do in a year, nevermind five. As a first time founder, probably the most common situation that angels are involved with, I have zero past experience that would even give me a slight chance of predicting the future. Even large corporations that have decades of experience often miss their QUARTERLY projections. As you suggested, the best I can do is have a solid plan towards getting cash flow positive as quickly as possible. At that point I can begin to provide limited future projections. Even if they're wrong I'll still be in the green and as far away from the "job boards" as possible.
  • I've read lot of advice articles on raising capital, and this is one of the best. I particularly like the part about the 5-year plan. We've never projected out that far but, believe it or not, some people just absolutely insist on it. So, actually, we did spin up some numbers, but just like everyone else we picked a CAGR and simply ramped all the numbers. That funding, naturally, still didn't happen.

    For a follow-up post, I'd like to see the 4 things that will get you an angel investment.
  • bibo
    Good post. Merci.
  • Thank you for this.. I didnt know what a angel investor was untill now.
  • wheresurl
    I enjoyed your section on customer acquisition. I must confess that my current pitch would have failed in your eyes, and we knew it was on the weak side. The suggestions you give reminded me that we already had specific customer groups that we were targeting, and that our features were mapping to their needs, so that should be the starting point for our acquisition slide.

    I look forward to part two. Also, I watched Basil Peters (one of the commenters) 30 minute presentation, and thought he had some interesting perspectives.

    Ron Hodson, CEO & budding pitch writer
    www.wheresurl.com
  • The majority of Cohen's observations seem to pertain to web based start ups. I wonder if his views would shift in a different industry...
  • Why would you say that?

    I do agree that in other industries it can be easier to make projections because costs and customer acquisition can be more quantifiable.

    Still, I challenge you (for example) to find an industry in which a "5 year project" for a BRAND NEW COMPANY has any validity.
  • william
    I was at a work shop in Ames Iowa today. the key note speaker sounded the same as your speaker in here. IPO.Viable needs, some of the same words. I am asking if there might be another ..com going on here.
    this guy wrote a book, and is publishing it. sells it at these work shops, so far I have found his same wording in here. ever heard of cut and paste.
  • hmmm, I never said "viable needs" and "IPO" is not a word anyone made up....
  • JackHandy
    I disagree with your point about 5 year projections. Sure, its impossible to predict, but I think it provides a great barometer for whether management is thinking realistically, and also provides a queue for other questions to justify the thinking and all the components which go into the cost and revenues.
  • Have you seen a 5-year projection that you felt was realistic?

    I agree with you that IF the 5-year proj seemed reasonable, PERHAPS that would be a good sign. In my experience, however, that hasn't happened even once.

    What I *do* want to hear is *how* revenue and costs will be handled, which I talked about in detail in the article. But the projection itself is useless to me.
  • S3millar
    Probably one of the best articles I have read on this site. Very well said.
  • marshsutherland
    Hey Jason, this is my favorite blog. This one wins the award...whatever that is.

    So I *was* going to say "What about old school angels who think you are crap and disrespectful if you didn't create the five year projection?"

    But then the answer was obvious:
    a) Those investors probably don't have the best track record

    b) They don't get web so why partner with someone who doesn't know your industry?

    That's all. Keep it up!

    Marsh Sutherland
    http://socialgrow.com
    @socialgrow
  • Thanks for the kind words!

    Traditional angels don't necessarily have a bad track record. However, my point of view is that if they significantly disagree on a significant number of these points (and stay tuned for 4 more in a subsequent article!), IMO they're not being reasonable or practical, and therefore they're probably a bad influence over your business.
  • kerryrosenhagen
    So good angel investors agree with you. If they disagree, they are by definition bad angel investors. Got it.
  • chukari
    if it wasn't for a bit of hubris on writer's part, this'd be readable. as the japanese say, small bamboos make the loudest noise ..
  • I humbly accept your criticism!

    Seriously, I do. But allow me to defend my style choice:

    1. Being strong-worded is more brief and powerful than hedging.
    2. Hedging barely adds to the content, but hampers readability.
    3. If you read more of my work (http://blog.asmartbear.com) you'll see that I'm transparent and honest about all sorts of things, and *often* talk about my mistakes and how I've changed my mind.
  • frinsen
    Thx for these honest thoughts!
  • taleb taleb
    screw greedy capitalist angels. this is hubris, alright. you owe it to black swan, and could not repeat it again.
  • It's funny you should say this, since I'm on the record as agreeing with you that it's hard to tell the difference between ability and luck! http://blog.asmartbear.com/business-advice-plag...

    However:

    1. I've been successful three times, so the Black Swan argument is harder to make.
    2. All of the points above are good business tips regardless.
    3. I agree many people don't need investment at all! But that doesn't mean Angels == Greedy. In fact, I'm wondering where you got that idea...
  • Love this post Jason.
    I would describe it as how to move from generalities to the specifics.
    So many people have become so used to general theory that they have no idea how to apply that in practice.
    I reckon every budding entrepreneur should read your list and try to stick to it
    http://www.onesherpa.com
  • Founder
    I have the feature slide with all the checks in my deck but I tell investors it's all BS since our 2 competitors are in closed Beta. It's just there because they expect it.
    Also when I am asked about the 5 year plan I always say we can take out the magic 8 ball and see what it says.

    Investors don't like my answers to much.

    Great post.
  • shreyas
    kudos to u jason ... it's a really hardhitting article ... loved it.

    shreyas
  • Great Post ! Honesty and transparency IS the new economy - although seems the old economy is having a hard time going quietly into the night. Still tons of stuff getting funded on flashy ppts and 'old-boy networks'.

    Re-educating myself and shedding corporate marketing speak, AKA; all the no-no's of this article - then applying general best practices of web2.0, AKA; WYSIWYG, total transparency, etc is the goal - but, you have to catch yourself!

    Thanks Jason - help us keep it real ;o)
  • Thanks for the insight, very timely for us as we've just begun to actively seek angel capital and looking for transparent perspectives from the other side...

    jason@cityryde.com
  • This list is defintely going on Yakkering.com - King of List. This is a great list for my readers.
  • That´s a great post, we will blog about this on http://www.spirofrog.de/blog for all youngsters starting businesses!
  • thanks for the insights!